​6 MONTHS LATER AND STILL NO INTEREST

FROM OUR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

Even Jim Hinton hits the bullseye now and then!
​“You’ve been asked for months and months to do an investigation, start an internal investigation over Alfredo Pedroza’s involvement with the Walt Ranch. And of course, of course, Diane’s not going to do it, Ryan is not going to do it, and Alfredo is not going to do it. Why are these three people uninterested in an investigation? …They hold the power to take Alfredo down and to serve justice for all…The Halls have bought Alfredo, they have bought Mike Thompson, they have bought judges, they think, they think they own us and can do whatever they want. But, if we hold Mike Thompson accountable and we start asking Mike Thompson how come there’s no federal investigation here, maybe Christmas will come early and we’ll see Alfredo in handcuffs before too long.” -Jim Hinton during general public comment at the Napa County Board of Supervisors meeting August 23, 2022, video below.

However, disappointingly, Supervisor Diane Dillon then delivers a cryptic message regarding "(an) investigation regarding the recording." The recording? Is she talking about Minh Tran's audio where he tells staff he is not taking the job in Riverside? She is not clear, but this is our best guess. Still, it is uncertain if the recording was made by a staff member or by Minh Tran himself, in order to obtain the 18 months of severance pay. Who knows? Only Minh Tran and perhaps, maybe, Diane Dillon and Alfredo Pedroza. This is just a guess as guessing is all we the public can do with the present board where transparency is non-existent. We this is a bit odd to say the least, that the Board would agendize an audio recording, but not their colleague's use of his office for his financial and familial gain.  

The transcript of Minh Tran published on our Napa Uncensored page here


​letter: pedroza: pr or probity, napa valley register
by paul moser, local author, Political Commentator & Napa county resident for over 40 years.
JULY 9, 2022 NAPA VALLEY REGISTER
Napa county cash contacted paul moser who shared that it took over three weeks for nvr Editor dan evans to publish this letter to the editor. citizens called up mr. evans with little to no response but it was finally published july 9, 2022

By many accounts, County Supervisor Alfredo Pedroza is a nice guy. Some identify him as savvy. He is also apparently ambitious, but in America ambition is no crime, unless of course you happen to be a woman. Sexism lives!
So Supervisor Pedroza has a sizable base of support. Yet however you view him and his public persona, there are disturbing elements in his behavior regarding the 405 acres of land he acquired with his father-in-law in May of 2021, land adjacent to the controversial Walt Ranch vineyard project, located in the county’s eastern hills. Mr. Pedroza had consistently voted to approve various elements of the Walt Ranch project, even after acquiring the adjacent parcels of land, dubbed Vinedos AP LLC.

The activities of a Napa County public official don’t often yield such a clear tutorial in the contrast between mere public relations and actual probity, so it is very useful to examine Supervisor Pedroza’s words and actions, which have garnered justifiably great attention since February of this year.

Consider that at a Feb. 8 meeting of the Board of Supervisors, citizens raised glaring conflict of interest questions regarding the investment (Vinedos AP LLC) he made along with his father-in-law, and how its proximity to the Walt Ranch project could financially benefit his father-in-law and eventually the extended family.

At that meeting, after the investment was exposed, Mr. Pedroza said he would recuse himself from voting on subsequent Walt Ranch issues “out of an abundance of caution.” This is of course not strictly true. He recused himself for one reason only: because he got caught. Had no citizens spoken up, he surely would not have stepped back. A responsible recusal, out of a true “abundance of caution,” would have occurred in May of 2021, when he and his father-in-law purchased the 405 acres, or even as they considered the acquisition.

So is his response PR or probity?

Further, on the very same day the Vinedos AP LLC purchase was exposed at the BOS hearing, Mr. Pedroza contacted California’s Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) and presented them with his own version of the land deal. Based solely on incomplete information he himself submitted, the commission provided him with an “advice letter” saying that he appeared to have no conflict of interest. This lightning-fast move on his part is what is called “getting ahead of the message,” or “shaping the narrative.” It is precisely the same tactic employed by our former “president” in proclaiming the 2020 election fraudulent. There was of course no massive fraud in the election, but by quickly and publicly claiming there was fraud, he attempted to shape public opinion, feeding the confirmation bias of his supporters ahead of all the recounts, investigations, and court cases that ultimately proved him wrong.

So is Mr. Pedroza’s response PR or probity?

Still further: when the FPPC announced on March 25 that, based on information received from Napa citizens, they would pursue an investigation of Mr. Pedroza’s activities, his response was not to take responsibility for his actions, but to blame the times we are living in.

He said: “I should have been more sensitive to the fact that governing in a time of division, being a leader in this community, opens us up to additional scrutiny and hyperbole, but I will not be deterred.”
You see, it’s those darn divisive times we live in. It wasn’t his own decision to make the purchase that caused trouble for him, but the people who were scrutinizing him. It’s all their fault! So not only is he deflecting responsibility for his actions, but is also assuming a role that contains a whiff of martyrdom. He’s being unfairly called out by citizens expecting him to avoid “even the appearance of impropriety.” How dare they. By the way, it’s hard to make sense of his use of the word “hyperbole” in the statement, since every bit of information revealed about Vinedos AP LLC was true, and involved no exaggeration whatsoever.

PR or probity?

And finally, if you’re under investigation by the FPPC and eager to avoid “even the appearance of impropriety,” is it a great idea to hire as your attorney the man who ran the Enforcement Division of the FPPC from 2009 to 2015, Gary Winuk? It’s a move that only amplifies the impression of using insider connections to tilt the scales of justice in your favor. Yet this is exactly what Mr. Pedroza has done. It doesn’t even qualify as good PR, much less probity.

So regardless of the findings of the FPPC, whatever those might be, Mr. Pedroza is sending us messages that are not those of an inspiring leader, but rather of a canny political operative compulsively crafting a public image. Does this qualify as probity?
Paul Moser
Napa

​From the Diversity Watch Napa YouTube description: "In attendance were Charles Wagner, who is a major donor to Alfredo Pedroza ($25,000 toward 2020), owner of Caymus Vineyards and other businesses, Mr. Wagner's winemaker, Harvest Duhig, Linsey Gallagher, the CEO and President of Visit Napa Valley, Michael Murray, who is CEO of Napa Waste and Recycling and also serves as treasurer for Alfredo Pedroza's political campaign and others. The majority of them did not mention anything about whether or not Alfredo Pedroza is connected to Vinedos AP LLC. We included Michael Carlson, who is the vice president Caymus Vineyards as well as counsel for owner Charles Wagner who did briefly hint at an investigation. 

Most of the speakers who came to show support had very specific talking points: that this is a racist issue, that this issue is being brought forward by a "small group" of "hateful" people, and that these people are making personal attacks. We at Diversity Watch Napa, which is POC founded and ran, to be clear, have neither found evidence of such behavior nor do we condone it. Ever. On the contrary, we have had numerous individuals reach out to us, from all walks of life, only seeking the truth. This was never personal. We have also concluded that the call for resignation is a sound one, that Alfredo Pedroza, by legal definition, is a partner to the Vinedos AP, LLC"


​
​THE TIMELINE:



Vinedos AP LLC, (Spanish for Vineyards AP), was opened as a business offering consulting services in January 2021 with Esteban Llamas named as the only member (as far as we can tell), who is a vineyard manager and resides in Soda Canyon, on Gallo's Stagecoach Vineyard property. The Vinedos AP LLC's business address was recorded as a PO Box inside St. Helena's Adams Street Shipping. His daughter, Brenda Pedroza, wife of Napa County District 4 Supervisor Alfredo Pedroza, also began the registration process for an LLC called Le Fe Vineyards, (Spanish for faith), on May 9, 2021, but it appears to not have been finalized. On May 28, 2021, Vinedos AP purchased 6 parcels, across from Peter Read's Circle R Ranch. The deeds for the 6 parcels were rolled into one and sold for $2M, with a $300,000 down payment and $1.7M in a private loan that appears to be a seller carryback by Peter Read, who originally purchased the properties with eleven others in 2015 for $22.8M+; this is a transaction worthy of further study. The County has the Roll Values totaling $3,540,187 as of May 28, 2021 for all 404.73 acres. Four months later, the parcels were refinanced for $2.7M by Poppy Bank. Coincidentally, Alfredo & Brenda Pedroza refinanced their home at the same time, also with Poppy Bank, for $2.7M. Zillow estimates their home value at $1.3M, which was originally purchased in 2015 for $760,000. Brenda Pedroza works as the Director of Philanthropy at Ole Health. Taxes on the parcels were paid in December 2021. In January 2022, George Altamura, Sr., paid off the seller carryback, and established a loan to Vinedos AP, so in addition to Poppy Bank, Vinedos AP also owes George Altamura, Sr., $1.76M. 


April 2015 Alfredo & Brenda Pedroza bought their silverado country club home for $760,000, with a loan of $608,000 through people's Hm equity inc
​

IN 2019, THEY REFINANCED FOR $660,000 THROUGH QUICKEN

RECONbyQ_troon_sept_2019.21662_dt.pdf
File Size: 76 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
NEW_DT_troon_oct_2019.19729_dt.pdf
File Size: 1327 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File


IN 2020, THEY REFINANCED AGAIN FOR $655,400 THROUGH QUICKEN FOR A RATE OF 3%

reconsub_troon_2020.18041_dt.pdf
File Size: 54 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
newdt_troon_2020.22398_dt.pdf
File Size: 1478 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

APRIL 16, 2021 PEDROZA'S TAKE OUT A NEW 30-YEAR LOAN OF $702,000 WITH FIRST REPUBLIC BANK, AT WITH AN ADJUSTABLE RATE RIDER OF 2.7% TO LAST UNTIL MAY 2028:  

apr_troon_loan_2021.14980_dt.pdf
File Size: 1962 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

may 2021, the quicken loan from 2020 is paid off

reconveyance_Pedroza_home_2020/21
File Size: 62 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

meanwhile, in 2021 two different llc's are opened by pedroza's and llamas:

Vinedos_sos_articles_org_Jan2021
File Size: 554 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
Vinedos_sos_soi_March2021
File Size: 215 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
La_Fe_Vineyards_SOS_May9_2021
File Size: 554 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
It appears that Brenda Pedroza never finalized her paperwork for La Fe Vineyards, but status shows "active" on the Secretary of State website. 

vinedos AP grant deed, deed of trust & easement for first purchase in may 2021:

grantdeed_may2021
File Size: 645 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
deedtrust_may2021
File Size: 854 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
easement_may2021
File Size: 278 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

county roll values at time of purchase totaling $3,540,187.00:

roll_value_072: $146,370.00
File Size: 248 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
roll_value_084: $1,283,817.00
File Size: 248 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
roll_value_085: $305,000.00
File Size: 248 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
roll_value_086: $460,000.00
File Size: 248 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
roll_value_087: $675,000.00
File Size: 248 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
roll_value_088: $670,000.00
File Size: 248 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File


​four months after original purchase, parcels are refinanced for an additional $700,000 & pedroza's use their home for $2.7m collateral with poppy bank:

deedtrustSept2021
File Size: 1504 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
refinance_parcels_oct2021
File Size: 36 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
refi_AP_home_oct21
File Size: 111 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
Alfredo Pedroza's residence is estimated value at $1,245,000 per Zillow, February 2022. The Pedroza's did put in a swimming pool which will add a few grand and Napa prices have gone up, so it's not so outrageous, but we still have questions. The terms, mortgage vs collateral are similar, in that there is a lien that is attached to his residence for $2.7 million from Poppy Bank, which is referenced in the refi_AP_home_oct21 above.  In other words, if any terms default on the Vinedos AP property, (Alfredo Pedroza is saying he is using his primary residence as collateral), then it would default on both properties, 332 Troon and the 6 parcels.  

According to Alfredo Pedroza, he used his home to secure collateral for the 6 parcels. If that can be verified, then it would suggest that the $702,000 from April 2021 would be fixed and the $2M would be released from his primary residence when the six parcels note paid that back. However, the way it looks on public records is that his home has a first mortgage for $2.7M that paid off the April 2021 mortgage. So, there are missing pieces to verify the terms on both his primary residence and the six parcels and these terms of the loans are not public information. Alfredo Pedroza has a vested interest in the outcome of whatever happens to the six parcels. This makes Alfredo Pedroza a partner to Esteban Llamas, which is indeed a conflict of interest.
​

meanwhile, alfredo pedroza has new interest in atlas peak fire safety:

Picture







Screenshot from Alfredo Pedroza's Facebook 
October 15, 2021

A new proposed fire tax on the June 2022 ballot is being discussed at the March 8, 2022 board of supervisors meeting. 

The Board of Supervisors is willing to put their efforts and political capital to prevent fires prospectively, but who will it help? There is also smoke coming from Vinedos AP on Atlas Peak, but they are not willing to look if there is a fire. 

2021 tax bills. scroll down for more tax history:

taxbill_072_dec2021
File Size: 393 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
taxbill_084_Dec2021
File Size: 393 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
taxbill_085_Dec2021
File Size: 393 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
taxbill_086_Dec2021
File Size: 393 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
taxbill_087_Dec2021
File Size: 393 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
taxbill_088_Dec2021
File Size: 393 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

Six property tax checks signed by a familiar signature, totaling $19,696.97:

Alfredo Pedroza's Signature SAMPLES:

December 14, 2021 walt ranch hearing

Below is the excerpt of the disclosures that then chair Alfredo Pedroza called for from the Supervisors. Alfredo Pedroza disclosed he met with Mike Reynolds, President of HALL Wines and also that he spoke to Chris Malan and Jim Wilson, both of whom are local residents and do not necessitate disclosure. This is the first public moment when it would have been appropriate to mention his family's dealings with the adjacent property. It is unclear why he mentioned the two local residents.

EARLY JANUARY 2022 PEDROZA's refinance their rental property at 2433 flagstone for $625,000 through rocket mortgage:

flagstone_2022.pdf
File Size: 258 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
flagstone_2022.227_dt.pdf
File Size: 1483 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
flagstone_2022.557_dt.pdf
File Size: 57 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
flagstone_taxes_2021.pdf
File Size: 396 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

george altamura, sr. pays the seller carry back/private loan to peter read. alfredo pedroza's family now owes george $1.76M in addition to owing poppy bank:

deedtrust_assign_rents_acceleration_Altamura_Jan2022
File Size: 804 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
Subordination_agreement_Altamura_Jan2022
File Size: 719 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
reconveyance_sub_trustee_Jan2022
File Size: 101 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

january 27, 2022 - equipment delivered

                          
Piña Vineyard management drops off a forklift. Beth Nelsen arrived just in time to talk to the person who said they were dropping off a forklift because, "they are going to plant a new vineyard." When asked if they knew whose job it was or who the vineyard belonged to, they answered that they do not know but that they call this land, "Atlas AV." 

Five of the six parcels came with conservation easements. The northern most, where this is pictured, did not. It is 155.90 acres in size and is the largest of the six.
APN: 032-160-084-000:
​


​Alfredo pedroza's correspondence with the fppc advice desk february 8, 2022:

pedroza_to_fppc.pdf
File Size: 38 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
Picture
Handwritten anonymous letter sent to Beth Nelsen, February 2022:

"PEDROZA

There is no way that a man, living on a ranch property without a mailing address, can get a $2.7million loan without a personal guarantee.

Pedroza's personal guarantee makes him a major part of the transaction. 

There is no way that Poppy Bank will release the personal guarantee.

Why would a man living on a ranch without a mailing address, purchase a property if it wasn't for his children. He is a vineyard manager, not a real estate developer."





​community member catches person stealing a resign alfredo pedroza sign
Community member Xulio posted this video on Facebook, taken February 28, 2022, of a person dismantling a Resign Alfredo sign and then putting it in the back of their white Audi station wagon. Napa County Cash was able to determine that the license plate on the vehicle is registered to Caymus Vineyards. The owner of Caymus is Charles Wagner, who donated $25,000 toward Alfredo Pedroza's 2020 campaign. The driver who dismantled the sign was also contacted and asked to return the sign, but has yet to respond. 

See the Alfredo Pedroza page on this site for more donations. 


​beth nelsen talks to person working for alfredo:


march 1, 2022 from Fppc to beth nelsen:


MARCH 25, 2022 Letter received from fppc to beth nelsen:
"WE WILL INVESTIGATE"

April 1, 2022 alfredo pedroza turns in his 700 form for 2021:

2021_700.pdf
File Size: 740 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File


​tax history since 2015. Figures shown are paid 2x year with annual total below:


​Who is esteban llamas?

We know he is Alfredo Pedroza's father in law and a Vineyard Manager for Stagecoach, owned by Gallo. We also know he owns two homes, one purchased in 1998 and the other in 2012. One of those tax bills, (Russell St), has never gone to Troon Drive, Alfredo's home, and the other, (Hahnemann), always went to Hahnemann, the address of the property, until the year the parcels were purchased. 

"The mailing address for the Vinedos AP, LLC deed was Pedroza’s address. Pedroza showed a document indicating that his father-in-law’s mail is forwarded to Pedroza’s house. His in-laws live on a ranch property, he said." -Napa Valley Register, February 11, 2022. 

​Alfredo's mailbox is pictured below, underneath is Esteban's lockbox on Soda Canyon Road. Photos from a concerned community member.
esteban_deed_russell.pdf
File Size: 36 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
hahn_2016_tax.pdf
File Size: 397 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
history_esteban_russell
File Size: 38 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
hahn_2015_tax.pdf
File Size: 397 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
history_esteban_hahnemann
File Size: 148 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
hahn_2014_tax.pdf
File Size: 397 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
hahn_2021_tax.pdf
File Size: 397 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
russell_2021_tax.pdf
File Size: 397 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
hahn_2020_tax.pdf
File Size: 397 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
russell_2020_tax.pdf
File Size: 397 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
hahn_2019_tax.pdf
File Size: 397 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
russell_2019_tax.pdf
File Size: 397 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
hahn_2018_tax.pdf
File Size: 398 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
hahn_2017_tax.pdf
File Size: 397 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
russell_2018_tax.pdf
File Size: 397 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
russell_2014_tax.pdf
File Size: 397 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File


​alfredo pedroza: a history of questionable behavior

 In this section, we aim to provide a thorough presentation. First, we will examine his 700 forms, which are public records where our elected officials are asked to disclose a snapshot their finances, however broad. Below you may examine the 700 forms and note the differences over the years. 

Since 2016, Alfredo Pedroza has listed his business name as Alfredo Pedroza and himself as the sole proprietor/owner of a business that offers finance/banking/investments consultation. The forms remained similar until 2018, where he was asked to list businesses that earned more than $10,000 and he had listed Poppy Bank, Mechanics Bank and Pacific Hospitality Group, which is the Meritage Resort in Napa, owned by Timothy R. Busch. The business is actually called Pacific Hospitality Group Ventures, Inc., and you can read the Secretary of State Statement of Information. It would appear Alfredo Pedroza has been taking consulting fees from Tim Busch/the Meritage Resort, but it is hard to say by public record alone. This was written before 2021 forms were due, so it is noted this was not listed for 2021.

Something shifted in 2019, however, when Alfredo Pedroza has kept his business as sole proprietor/owner, but now has a second business under his name where he states his business position as a "member." All three- Poppy Bank, Mechanics Bank and now "Pacific Group," (not Pacific Hospitality Group), are all listed under this second business entity where he lists himself as "member." There is a "Pacific Group" online that offers wealth management services, but we do not believe this is the business Alfredo Pedroza intended to submit.

Since 2018, Alfredo Pedroza has listed himself on his 700 forms an investor with EET Napa, LLC who owns Gran Electrica restaurant in Napa and also Napa Franchise Ventures II, LLC, another Timothy R. Busch venture, formed in 2016 in Delaware, of which Pacific Hospitality Group Ventures, Inc., is a member. He claims his investments to be between $10k-$100K each.
700_2021.pdf
File Size: 740 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
700_2020.pdf
File Size: 418 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
700_2019.pdf
File Size: 496 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
700_2018.pdf
File Size: 1073 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
700_2017.pdf
File Size: 385 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
700_2016.pdf
File Size: 4632 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
phg_sos-soi_2022.pdf
File Size: 237 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

​We get a lot of correspondence, so thank you all who care and only want good government. This message was sent to Beth Nelsen, via this website. It is not the first story we've heard where victims of the Atlas Peak fire in 2017 were ignored by their supervisor, Alfredo Pedroza. Sadly, this family took an even harder hit, being used in a political spin and then further ignored:


​IN THE MEDIA:

"Political ad a desperate move," by Bill Mellberg, submitted to Napa Valley Register
April 5, 2022

"Fair Political Practices Commission decides to investigate Napa County Supervisor Pedroza," by Barry Eberling
March 28, 2022 Napa Valley Register

"We want the truth," by Mike Hackett, submitted to the Napa Valley Register
March 19, 2022

"Napa County could discuss its investigation powers," by Barry Eberling
March 9, 2022 Napa Valley Register

"Pedroza should resign," by Karla Bailey, submitted to the Napa Valley Register
March 7, 2022

"We only want the truth," by Douglas L. Weed, submitted to the Napa Valley Register
March 7, 2022

"Pedroza's cloud of smoke," by Paul Moser, submitted to the Napa Valley Register
March 6, 2022 

"Pedroza betrayed our trust," by Robin Ellison, submitted to the Napa Valley Register
March 5, 2022

"FPPC deciding its role in Napa Supervisor Pedroza matter," by Barry Eberling
March 3, 2022 Napa Valley Register

"Napa County Board of Supervisors to Reconsider Walt Ranch Project Next Month," by Kerana Todorov
March 2, 2022 Wine Business 
Picture
"Controversial Walt Ranch development vote delayed in Napa following protests," by Jess Lander, Esther Mobley
March 1, 2022 San Francisco Chronicle

"Napa Supervisor Pedroza defended and criticized amongst Vinedos matter," by Barry Eberling
March 1, 2022 Napa Valley Register
​
"A wealthy family's plans for a Napa vineyard have exploded into controversy. The outcome could define the valley's future," by Esther Mobley, Jess Lander
February 27, 2022 San Francisco Chronicle

"Walt Ranch mitigations returns to Napa Board of Supervisors on Tuesday," by Barry Eberling
February 27, 2022 Napa Valley Register

"Pedroza Should Resign," by Beth Nelsen, submitted to the Napa Valley Register
February 22, 2022 

"Feeling 'angry, let down and used," by Daniel Mufson, submitted to Napa Valley Register
February 19, 2022

"Pedroza Stands to Benefit From Walt Ranch," by Lisa Seran, submitted to Napa Valley Register
February 15, 2022 

"Letter: The Cruelty of Walt Ranch," by Ron Rhyno, submitted to Napa Valley Register
February 12, 2022 

"Walt Ranch and the Lands of Pedroza," by Bill Hocker
February 11, 2022 Soda Canyon Road

"Napa Supervisor Alfredo Pedroza Talks About Conflict-of-Interest Allegations," by Barry Eberling
February 11, 2022 Napa Valley Register

 "Last Minute Glitch Delays Final Approval of Walt Ranch Vineyard Project in Napa Valley," by Kerana Todorov
February 9, 2022 Wine Business

"Napa County Delays Walt Ranch Hearing Amid Conflict-of-Interest Allegations," by Barry Eberling
February 8, 2022 Napa Valley Register
Site powered by Weebly. Managed by GreenGeeks